https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107013 The District Forum found the complaint maintainable against a respondent-company for not paying maturity amounts on fixed deposit receipts. Despite the respondent's argument based on a High Court order, the Forum held the opposite party deficient in service and ordered payment of maturity amounts with interest and compensation. The appellate authority upheld this decision, emphasizing the complainant's right to seek relief under the Consumer Protection Act. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the District Forum's order in favor of the complainant due to the clear evidence of deposits and the respondent's failure to pay. en-us Wed, 11 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107013 The District Forum found the complaint maintainable against a respondent-company for not paying maturity amounts on fixed deposit receipts. Despite the respondent's argument based on a High Court order, the Forum held the opposite party deficient in service and ordered payment of maturity amounts with interest and compensation. The appellate authority upheld this decision, emphasizing the complainant's right to seek relief under the Consumer Protection Act. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the District Forum's order in favor of the complainant due to the clear evidence of deposits and the respondent's failure to pay. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 11 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107013