<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (3) TMI 966 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107007</link>
    <description>Share transfers remain valid where permitted by the company&#039;s articles of association, even if a joint venture agreement requires shareholder consent that has not been incorporated into those articles. The transfer of CGL&#039;s shares to Bharti was treated as consistent with the articles, following board approval, registration of Bharti as a member, and telecommunications approval subject to foreign-equity and Indian-management conditions. Satwant Singh&#039;s claimed appointment and related corporate actions lacked validity because the relied-on board minutes were not official records. Interim relief was refused, status quo was directed, and a neutral chairman was appointed to oversee board functioning and preserve compliant management pending the disputes and possible arbitration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 19:10:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144027" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (3) TMI 966 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107007</link>
      <description>Share transfers remain valid where permitted by the company&#039;s articles of association, even if a joint venture agreement requires shareholder consent that has not been incorporated into those articles. The transfer of CGL&#039;s shares to Bharti was treated as consistent with the articles, following board approval, registration of Bharti as a member, and telecommunications approval subject to foreign-equity and Indian-management conditions. Satwant Singh&#039;s claimed appointment and related corporate actions lacked validity because the relied-on board minutes were not official records. Interim relief was refused, status quo was directed, and a neutral chairman was appointed to oversee board functioning and preserve compliant management pending the disputes and possible arbitration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107007</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>