https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107003 The court ruled in favor of the Liquidator of a bank under winding up, allowing them to retain possession of office premises for official purposes despite the landlord's request for return. The judgment emphasized the importance of safeguarding sensitive documents and conducting necessary duties related to pending legal cases. It highlighted the significance of the Liquidator's work in the bank's liquidation process and the need to prioritize the safekeeping of records over mere storage needs. The decision reflects a balanced approach considering the complexities of liquidation proceedings and the public interest at stake. en-us Fri, 23 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Mar 2012 19:07:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107003 The court ruled in favor of the Liquidator of a bank under winding up, allowing them to retain possession of office premises for official purposes despite the landlord's request for return. The judgment emphasized the importance of safeguarding sensitive documents and conducting necessary duties related to pending legal cases. It highlighted the significance of the Liquidator's work in the bank's liquidation process and the need to prioritize the safekeeping of records over mere storage needs. The decision reflects a balanced approach considering the complexities of liquidation proceedings and the public interest at stake. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 23 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107003