https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106997 The appeal was dismissed by the City Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, as the complainant's claim for allotment of shares and compensation was denied. The Forum concluded that the complainant, as a prospective purchaser, lacked entitlement to the claim against the company. Additionally, the complainant was not considered a consumer based on legal precedent, and the bank, acting as a collecting agent, was found not liable towards the complainant. Previous judgments supported the dismissal of the appeal, resulting in no costs being awarded to the appellant. en-us Wed, 21 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106997 The appeal was dismissed by the City Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, as the complainant's claim for allotment of shares and compensation was denied. The Forum concluded that the complainant, as a prospective purchaser, lacked entitlement to the claim against the company. Additionally, the complainant was not considered a consumer based on legal precedent, and the bank, acting as a collecting agent, was found not liable towards the complainant. Previous judgments supported the dismissal of the appeal, resulting in no costs being awarded to the appellant. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 21 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106997