<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (3) TMI 960 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106996</link>
    <description>The court affirmed that restrictions in Article 7 of the Articles of Association remain valid even in a court auction sale. The company was justified in refusing transfer and registration of shares bought at auction, as the sale did not override existing transfer restrictions. The appellate court corrected the trial judge&#039;s error in failing to differentiate between rights in a court sale and company discretion. The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:49:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144016" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (3) TMI 960 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106996</link>
      <description>The court affirmed that restrictions in Article 7 of the Articles of Association remain valid even in a court auction sale. The company was justified in refusing transfer and registration of shares bought at auction, as the sale did not override existing transfer restrictions. The appellate court corrected the trial judge&#039;s error in failing to differentiate between rights in a court sale and company discretion. The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106996</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>