<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 553 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106977</link>
    <description>Central excise duty could not be fastened on the appellant for paper waste and scrap generated during manufacturing in another unit, because the waste arose from that other unit&#039;s processing activity and not from the appellant&#039;s manufacture. Broke was also held not liable to duty because it was not marketable goods. The duty demand against the appellant was therefore unsustainable, and no central excise duty attached to broke.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 17:47:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143997" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 553 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106977</link>
      <description>Central excise duty could not be fastened on the appellant for paper waste and scrap generated during manufacturing in another unit, because the waste arose from that other unit&#039;s processing activity and not from the appellant&#039;s manufacture. Broke was also held not liable to duty because it was not marketable goods. The duty demand against the appellant was therefore unsustainable, and no central excise duty attached to broke.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>