<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 540 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106964</link>
    <description>Exemption under Notification No. 152/94-Cus. depended on proof that the importer was a bona fide institution for the blind and deaf and that the goods were bona fide gifts or were bought from donations received abroad; on the facts discussed, those conditions were not met because the claimed charitable set-up lacked genuine activity and the import was arranged through a loan and routed as a gift, so the exemption claim failed. The declared import value was also rejected where original invoices and supplier records showed a higher value and the documentation was manipulated; on that basis, confiscation, redemption fine and personal penalties were sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 17:18:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143984" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 540 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106964</link>
      <description>Exemption under Notification No. 152/94-Cus. depended on proof that the importer was a bona fide institution for the blind and deaf and that the goods were bona fide gifts or were bought from donations received abroad; on the facts discussed, those conditions were not met because the claimed charitable set-up lacked genuine activity and the import was arranged through a loan and routed as a gift, so the exemption claim failed. The declared import value was also rejected where original invoices and supplier records showed a higher value and the documentation was manipulated; on that basis, confiscation, redemption fine and personal penalties were sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106964</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>