<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 538 - CEGAT,  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106962</link>
    <description>In a customs classification dispute concerning ITC (HS) classification and the entry for diabetic beverages, the tribunal noted that the phrase was not defined in the tariff and that the goods&#039; description did not prima facie establish suitability as a diet beverage. It also recorded that a substantial part of the penalty had already been deposited. On that basis, pre-deposit of the remaining penalty was waived and recovery was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 17:16:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143982" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 538 - CEGAT,  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106962</link>
      <description>In a customs classification dispute concerning ITC (HS) classification and the entry for diabetic beverages, the tribunal noted that the phrase was not defined in the tariff and that the goods&#039; description did not prima facie establish suitability as a diet beverage. It also recorded that a substantial part of the penalty had already been deposited. On that basis, pre-deposit of the remaining penalty was waived and recovery was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106962</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>