<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 703 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106953</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the duty demand but reduced the redemption fine to Rs. 75,000.00 and the penalty to Rs. 35,000.00. The Tribunal found the confiscation and penalty justified due to the quality discrepancy in the imported goods but considered the circumstances in reducing the fine and penalty. The appeal was rejected except for the modification in the quantum of the fine and penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:45:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143973" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 703 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106953</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the duty demand but reduced the redemption fine to Rs. 75,000.00 and the penalty to Rs. 35,000.00. The Tribunal found the confiscation and penalty justified due to the quality discrepancy in the imported goods but considered the circumstances in reducing the fine and penalty. The appeal was rejected except for the modification in the quantum of the fine and penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106953</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>