<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 702 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106952</link>
    <description>Repair and refurbishment of old and used LPG cylinders by retesting, cleaning, painting and refitting valves did not amount to manufacture because the cylinders remained cylinders and no new or distinct product emerged. The activity was treated as repair of an existing excisable article, so central excise duty was not leviable on the repaired cylinders and the assessee succeeded on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:41:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143972" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 702 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106952</link>
      <description>Repair and refurbishment of old and used LPG cylinders by retesting, cleaning, painting and refitting valves did not amount to manufacture because the cylinders remained cylinders and no new or distinct product emerged. The activity was treated as repair of an existing excisable article, so central excise duty was not leviable on the repaired cylinders and the assessee succeeded on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106952</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>