https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106948 An appeal under Section 9C of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 against the final finding of the Designated Authority was held not maintainable, so the challenge directed at that finding failed. The memorandum was filed beyond the prescribed period and no condonation application accompanied it; the attempt to treat it as a cross appeal to defeat limitation was rejected because a cross appeal or cross objection was not maintainable in this statutory appeal. On those grounds of limitation and maintainability, the application for condonation of delay and the appeal were rejected. en-us Mon, 08 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:28:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106948 An appeal under Section 9C of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 against the final finding of the Designated Authority was held not maintainable, so the challenge directed at that finding failed. The memorandum was filed beyond the prescribed period and no condonation application accompanied it; the attempt to treat it as a cross appeal to defeat limitation was rejected because a cross appeal or cross objection was not maintainable in this statutory appeal. On those grounds of limitation and maintainability, the application for condonation of delay and the appeal were rejected. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 08 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106948