<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 308 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106940</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected all appeals filed by both parties, affirming the classification of BOD Incubators under Heading 84.19 based on their function, classification of Other Incubators under the same heading due to the temperature change process, and the treatment of price as cum-duty price in line with legal precedents and the Central Excise Tariff Act. The Tribunal upheld the decisions made in the impugned order, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the treatment of price and the waiver of pre-deposit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 15:23:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143960" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 308 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106940</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected all appeals filed by both parties, affirming the classification of BOD Incubators under Heading 84.19 based on their function, classification of Other Incubators under the same heading due to the temperature change process, and the treatment of price as cum-duty price in line with legal precedents and the Central Excise Tariff Act. The Tribunal upheld the decisions made in the impugned order, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the treatment of price and the waiver of pre-deposit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>