<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 299 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106931</link>
    <description>In interim appeal proceedings, the Tribunal treated the classification and limitation disputes as contestable and balanced the competing interests by ordering a partial pre-deposit. Taking account of the confiscated goods already lying with the department, it directed deposit of a specified sum toward duty within one month and waived the remaining duty and penalty pending regular hearing, subject to compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 13:29:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 299 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106931</link>
      <description>In interim appeal proceedings, the Tribunal treated the classification and limitation disputes as contestable and balanced the competing interests by ordering a partial pre-deposit. Taking account of the confiscated goods already lying with the department, it directed deposit of a specified sum toward duty within one month and waived the remaining duty and penalty pending regular hearing, subject to compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106931</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>