<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 296 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106928</link>
    <description>Notification No. 75/87-C.E. granted full exemption for the first clearance slab up to the prescribed aggregate value, followed by a concessional rate for the next slab. An assessee who declared an intention to claim the notification did not forfeit that benefit merely by mistakenly paying duty at 15% on clearances that were otherwise within the exempt first slab. Where the exemption was available, Modvat credit taken on inputs used in the exempt clearances could not be retained and had to be reversed to that extent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 13:17:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143948" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 296 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106928</link>
      <description>Notification No. 75/87-C.E. granted full exemption for the first clearance slab up to the prescribed aggregate value, followed by a concessional rate for the next slab. An assessee who declared an intention to claim the notification did not forfeit that benefit merely by mistakenly paying duty at 15% on clearances that were otherwise within the exempt first slab. Where the exemption was available, Modvat credit taken on inputs used in the exempt clearances could not be retained and had to be reversed to that extent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106928</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>