https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106896 Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 stays proceedings only to the extent they would obstruct implementation of a sanctioned rehabilitation scheme. Where the creditor's claim arose after the scheme and was not included in either the original or modified scheme, the statutory bar does not extend to that independent liability. On those facts, the winding up proceeding was not covered by section 22 and the request for dismissal or stay was rejected. en-us Wed, 21 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Mar 2012 12:07:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106896 Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 stays proceedings only to the extent they would obstruct implementation of a sanctioned rehabilitation scheme. Where the creditor's claim arose after the scheme and was not included in either the original or modified scheme, the statutory bar does not extend to that independent liability. On those facts, the winding up proceeding was not covered by section 22 and the request for dismissal or stay was rejected. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 21 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106896