<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 732 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106883</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to dismiss appeals due to delays exceeding the new time limit set by an amended law reducing the period for filing an appeal. The Tribunal determined that the amended law should be applied without retrospective effect, distinguishing the case from a Supreme Court precedent involving procedural changes with broader objectives. Consequently, the Tribunal enforced the new limitation period strictly, resulting in the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 11:55:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143903" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 732 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106883</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to dismiss appeals due to delays exceeding the new time limit set by an amended law reducing the period for filing an appeal. The Tribunal determined that the amended law should be applied without retrospective effect, distinguishing the case from a Supreme Court precedent involving procedural changes with broader objectives. Consequently, the Tribunal enforced the new limitation period strictly, resulting in the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>