https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106861 Under SAFEMA, service of notices and orders is governed by section 22, and the CPC Order V procedure does not apply. The Court accepted that repeated service s, endorsements showing avoidance or refusal, and affixture after unsuccessful service under section 22(a) satisfied the statutory mode under section 22(b). Refusal to accept the personal hearing notice was treated as effective service. Objections to the affixture witness and other factual challenges not supported by the Tribunal record were rejected, and no jurisdictional infirmity was shown in the writ petitions. en-us Mon, 05 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Mar 2012 10:56:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106861 Under SAFEMA, service of notices and orders is governed by section 22, and the CPC Order V procedure does not apply. The Court accepted that repeated service s, endorsements showing avoidance or refusal, and affixture after unsuccessful service under section 22(a) satisfied the statutory mode under section 22(b). Refusal to accept the personal hearing notice was treated as effective service. Objections to the affixture witness and other factual challenges not supported by the Tribunal record were rejected, and no jurisdictional infirmity was shown in the writ petitions. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 05 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106861