<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (11) TMI 932 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106852</link>
    <description>The bar under section 69 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 applies to suits and other proceedings instituted in court, not to a consensual reference to arbitration made without court intervention by an unregistered firm; the reference and award were therefore not void for non-registration. The objection that the award was invalid because one arbitrator was not a Stock Exchange member also failed, as the relevant bye-laws had been amended in 1993 to permit a non-member on the Tribunal. The challenge to the arbitral award was rejected on both grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 10:46:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143872" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (11) TMI 932 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106852</link>
      <description>The bar under section 69 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 applies to suits and other proceedings instituted in court, not to a consensual reference to arbitration made without court intervention by an unregistered firm; the reference and award were therefore not void for non-registration. The objection that the award was invalid because one arbitrator was not a Stock Exchange member also failed, as the relevant bye-laws had been amended in 1993 to permit a non-member on the Tribunal. The challenge to the arbitral award was rejected on both grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106852</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>