<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 1067 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106849</link>
    <description>The court sanctioned the scheme of arrangement under sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, between the transferor-company and the transferee-company, transferring the Barium Chemicals Division. Shareholders&#039; consent was noted through affidavits, and majority creditor consent was discussed. The financial position of the transferee-company was addressed, ensuring employee rights and considering secured creditors&#039; interests. The court found no objections from shareholders or significant prejudice to secured creditors, ultimately approving the scheme to safeguard all parties&#039; interests and allowing the company petitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 10:31:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143869" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 1067 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106849</link>
      <description>The court sanctioned the scheme of arrangement under sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, between the transferor-company and the transferee-company, transferring the Barium Chemicals Division. Shareholders&#039; consent was noted through affidavits, and majority creditor consent was discussed. The financial position of the transferee-company was addressed, ensuring employee rights and considering secured creditors&#039; interests. The court found no objections from shareholders or significant prejudice to secured creditors, ultimately approving the scheme to safeguard all parties&#039; interests and allowing the company petitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106849</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>