<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (12) TMI 827 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106847</link>
    <description>The court found that the Company Law Board (CLB) did not follow proper legal procedures in handling the case, leading to a miscarriage of justice. It held that allegations of mismanagement and oppression by the petitioners were proven. The court set aside CLB&#039;s findings, directed the respondent-company or shareholders to purchase minority shares, and emphasized the importance of following legal procedures to maintain public trust.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2018 17:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143867" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (12) TMI 827 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106847</link>
      <description>The court found that the Company Law Board (CLB) did not follow proper legal procedures in handling the case, leading to a miscarriage of justice. It held that allegations of mismanagement and oppression by the petitioners were proven. The court set aside CLB&#039;s findings, directed the respondent-company or shareholders to purchase minority shares, and emphasized the importance of following legal procedures to maintain public trust.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106847</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>