https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106832 The court addressed an application under section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956, regarding the revival of a second appeal after the lessee-company went into liquidation. The court highlighted the requirement for leave to proceed with legal proceedings against a company in liquidation and the need for balancing jurisdictional considerations. Ultimately, the court referred the matter to the Chief Justice for a larger Bench or the appropriate Appellate Court specializing in company matters for resolution, emphasizing the importance of judicial comity and the thorough examination of legal implications in complex cases. en-us Tue, 16 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Mar 2012 18:24:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106832 The court addressed an application under section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956, regarding the revival of a second appeal after the lessee-company went into liquidation. The court highlighted the requirement for leave to proceed with legal proceedings against a company in liquidation and the need for balancing jurisdictional considerations. Ultimately, the court referred the matter to the Chief Justice for a larger Bench or the appropriate Appellate Court specializing in company matters for resolution, emphasizing the importance of judicial comity and the thorough examination of legal implications in complex cases. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 16 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106832