<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 1055 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN, JAIPUR BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106831</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the winding-up petition filed by a petitioner company against a respondent company due to disputed questions of fact and law in a civil suit pending in the Bombay High Court. The judgment highlighted the complex legal issues arising from the interpretation of agreements for sale, hire purchase, and lease of equipment, emphasizing that the disputes in the civil suit regarding ownership claims and termination of agreements were beyond the scope of the winding-up petition. The petitioner was granted liberty to pursue other legal remedies and negotiations with the respondent, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 18:21:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 1055 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN, JAIPUR BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106831</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the winding-up petition filed by a petitioner company against a respondent company due to disputed questions of fact and law in a civil suit pending in the Bombay High Court. The judgment highlighted the complex legal issues arising from the interpretation of agreements for sale, hire purchase, and lease of equipment, emphasizing that the disputes in the civil suit regarding ownership claims and termination of agreements were beyond the scope of the winding-up petition. The petitioner was granted liberty to pursue other legal remedies and negotiations with the respondent, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>