<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 1050 - GUJARAT STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106825</link>
    <description>The Gujarat State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission partially allowed the appeal, emphasizing the deficiency in service by opponent UTI in refusing to accept the complainant&#039;s request for reinvestment. The Commission ordered token compensation of Rs. 300 to be paid to the complainant within six weeks, highlighting the importance of honoring consumer rights and ensuring fair treatment in financial transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 1050 - GUJARAT STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106825</link>
      <description>The Gujarat State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission partially allowed the appeal, emphasizing the deficiency in service by opponent UTI in refusing to accept the complainant&#039;s request for reinvestment. The Commission ordered token compensation of Rs. 300 to be paid to the complainant within six weeks, highlighting the importance of honoring consumer rights and ensuring fair treatment in financial transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>