https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106816 Rules framed under Article 227 of the Constitution, read with Section 34(1A) of the Advocates Act, regulate only the fees recoverable as costs from the adversary, not the private fee payable by a client to his advocate. The High Court rules of 1990 were confined by their text and enabling provisions to taxation or regulation of costs in proceedings, including fees payable as costs for the opposing advocate. Because no statute was shown to authorise fixation of client-to-advocate fees, the challenge to a separate fee structure failed, and the circulars prescribing that structure were not struck down. en-us Fri, 05 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:50:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106816 Rules framed under Article 227 of the Constitution, read with Section 34(1A) of the Advocates Act, regulate only the fees recoverable as costs from the adversary, not the private fee payable by a client to his advocate. The High Court rules of 1990 were confined by their text and enabling provisions to taxation or regulation of costs in proceedings, including fees payable as costs for the opposing advocate. Because no statute was shown to authorise fixation of client-to-advocate fees, the challenge to a separate fee structure failed, and the circulars prescribing that structure were not struck down. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 05 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106816