<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 1042 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106815</link>
    <description>A rehabilitation-cum-amalgamation scheme under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 did not displace a lessor&#039;s contractual right under a perpetual lease deed to recover unearned increase on transfer. Section 32 gives overriding effect only against inconsistent laws or instruments having statutory force; it does not override contractual obligations in a lease deed. Because the lessor was not a party to the BIFR proceedings and the leased land remained the lessor&#039;s property, the scheme could not extinguish the contractual recovery right or transfer ownership to the transferee-company.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:48:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 1042 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106815</link>
      <description>A rehabilitation-cum-amalgamation scheme under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 did not displace a lessor&#039;s contractual right under a perpetual lease deed to recover unearned increase on transfer. Section 32 gives overriding effect only against inconsistent laws or instruments having statutory force; it does not override contractual obligations in a lease deed. Because the lessor was not a party to the BIFR proceedings and the leased land remained the lessor&#039;s property, the scheme could not extinguish the contractual recovery right or transfer ownership to the transferee-company.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106815</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>