<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 1050 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106802</link>
    <description>An order in winding-up proceedings refusing inspection and production of documents is appealable where it affects the petitioning creditor&#039;s ability to prosecute the case and is not merely procedural. The court held that the wide phrase &quot;any order made, or decision given, in the matter of the winding up&quot; covered the refusal here, so the preliminary objection to maintainability failed. It also held that documents concerning the letter of credit, receipt of goods in India, and accounts showing payments were directly relevant to the guarantee dispute and should have been produced for inspection. The challenge succeeded to that extent, and the impugned order was set aside accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:21:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143822" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 1050 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106802</link>
      <description>An order in winding-up proceedings refusing inspection and production of documents is appealable where it affects the petitioning creditor&#039;s ability to prosecute the case and is not merely procedural. The court held that the wide phrase &quot;any order made, or decision given, in the matter of the winding up&quot; covered the refusal here, so the preliminary objection to maintainability failed. It also held that documents concerning the letter of credit, receipt of goods in India, and accounts showing payments were directly relevant to the guarantee dispute and should have been produced for inspection. The challenge succeeded to that extent, and the impugned order was set aside accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106802</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>