<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 382 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106781</link>
    <description>Assembling chandeliers was held to amount to manufacture under Central Excise law, because the dispute before the Tribunal was confined to the Commissioner&#039;s finding on that process and no contrary challenge was raised by the respondent. The benefit of small scale exemption had already been granted by the Commissioner and that aspect was not in issue in the appeal. The finding on manufacture was therefore upheld and the Revenue appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:35:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 382 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106781</link>
      <description>Assembling chandeliers was held to amount to manufacture under Central Excise law, because the dispute before the Tribunal was confined to the Commissioner&#039;s finding on that process and no contrary challenge was raised by the respondent. The benefit of small scale exemption had already been granted by the Commissioner and that aspect was not in issue in the appeal. The finding on manufacture was therefore upheld and the Revenue appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>