https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106765 Ex parte disposal of an appeal was not treated as a mistake apparent on the face of the record where counsel lacked valid authority to represent the respondent, because no proper vakalatnama or other authorisation was produced. The Tribunal held that refusal to hear such counsel did not justify recall of the final order. It further stated that objections directed to the merits could not be reopened in review on a miscellaneous application, as the Tribunal has no inherent power to review its own order absent statutory authority. The request to recall the final order was therefore rejected and the review petition failed. en-us Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:57:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106765 Ex parte disposal of an appeal was not treated as a mistake apparent on the face of the record where counsel lacked valid authority to represent the respondent, because no proper vakalatnama or other authorisation was produced. The Tribunal held that refusal to hear such counsel did not justify recall of the final order. It further stated that objections directed to the merits could not be reopened in review on a miscellaneous application, as the Tribunal has no inherent power to review its own order absent statutory authority. The request to recall the final order was therefore rejected and the review petition failed. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106765