https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106756 Tel Rahat Rooh was held classifiable as a preparation for use on the hair under Heading 33.05, not as an Ayurvedic medicament under Heading 3003.30. The product fell within Chapter 33, and Chapter 30 could not apply where the goods were properly covered elsewhere. Therapeutic claims on the label or in literature were insufficient because no evidence showed use on a medical practitioner's advice or proof that the product cured disease as a medicine for limited therapeutic use. Classification turned on the product's nature, predominant use, and actual evidence of medicinal prescription, not on marketing assertions or ayurvedic ingredient references. en-us Tue, 08 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:35:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106756 Tel Rahat Rooh was held classifiable as a preparation for use on the hair under Heading 33.05, not as an Ayurvedic medicament under Heading 3003.30. The product fell within Chapter 33, and Chapter 30 could not apply where the goods were properly covered elsewhere. Therapeutic claims on the label or in literature were insufficient because no evidence showed use on a medical practitioner's advice or proof that the product cured disease as a medicine for limited therapeutic use. Classification turned on the product's nature, predominant use, and actual evidence of medicinal prescription, not on marketing assertions or ayurvedic ingredient references. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 08 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106756