https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106729 A writ challenge to a BIFR order was found inappropriate where section 25 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 provided an adequate statutory appeal. The Court also noted that the record showed hearings had been held and the unions had made submissions, while the materials did not establish any specific request for a further hearing under Regulation 20(6) of the BIFR Regulations, 1987. In the absence of a flagrant violation of law or natural justice, writ interference was declined and the impugned order was left undisturbed. en-us Mon, 23 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:30:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106729 A writ challenge to a BIFR order was found inappropriate where section 25 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 provided an adequate statutory appeal. The Court also noted that the record showed hearings had been held and the unions had made submissions, while the materials did not establish any specific request for a further hearing under Regulation 20(6) of the BIFR Regulations, 1987. In the absence of a flagrant violation of law or natural justice, writ interference was declined and the impugned order was left undisturbed. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 23 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106729