<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 608 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106724</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the extended period of limitation for demanding duty was not applicable in the case of M/s. S.N. Sunderson (Minerals) Ltd. as the Revenue had issued show cause notices in the past, indicating awareness of the activities. The Tribunal found that the circumstances did not warrant the extension and set aside the impugned orders solely on the aspect of time-limit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:26:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143744" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 608 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106724</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the extended period of limitation for demanding duty was not applicable in the case of M/s. S.N. Sunderson (Minerals) Ltd. as the Revenue had issued show cause notices in the past, indicating awareness of the activities. The Tribunal found that the circumstances did not warrant the extension and set aside the impugned orders solely on the aspect of time-limit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106724</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>