<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 827 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106710</link>
    <description>A compromise and arrangement scheme for restructuring company debts was examined under section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956. Foreign currency secured lenders were held not to form a separate class because the scheme applied identical terms to all secured creditors. The company&#039;s status as a relief undertaking did not bar the Company Court from entertaining the sanction petition, as the notification suspended remedies but not the court&#039;s supervisory jurisdiction. Conditional votes were treated as invalid for counting the statutory majority, and the scheme nonetheless met the required numerical threshold. Allegations of fraud, public policy, unfairness, and past transactions did not defeat sanction where the scheme was fair, lawful, and supported by creditors&#039; commercial wisdom.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:09:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 827 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106710</link>
      <description>A compromise and arrangement scheme for restructuring company debts was examined under section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956. Foreign currency secured lenders were held not to form a separate class because the scheme applied identical terms to all secured creditors. The company&#039;s status as a relief undertaking did not bar the Company Court from entertaining the sanction petition, as the notification suspended remedies but not the court&#039;s supervisory jurisdiction. Conditional votes were treated as invalid for counting the statutory majority, and the scheme nonetheless met the required numerical threshold. Allegations of fraud, public policy, unfairness, and past transactions did not defeat sanction where the scheme was fair, lawful, and supported by creditors&#039; commercial wisdom.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106710</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>