<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 589 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106705</link>
    <description>Goods cleared under bond require strict proof of export and a clear nexus between the bonded clearances and the export documents. The export claim failed because the invoices did not match the consignee and delivery addresses, the bonded bags were used for packing rice rather than exported as empty bags, the shipping bills and bills of lading related to rice in P.P. bags, and customs verification did not corroborate the AR.4s. Overwriting and alteration in the shipping bills further undermined the documents. On these facts, non-compliance with the prescribed export procedure was established and recovery of duty and penalty was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:02:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143725" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 589 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106705</link>
      <description>Goods cleared under bond require strict proof of export and a clear nexus between the bonded clearances and the export documents. The export claim failed because the invoices did not match the consignee and delivery addresses, the bonded bags were used for packing rice rather than exported as empty bags, the shipping bills and bills of lading related to rice in P.P. bags, and customs verification did not corroborate the AR.4s. Overwriting and alteration in the shipping bills further undermined the documents. On these facts, non-compliance with the prescribed export procedure was established and recovery of duty and penalty was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106705</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>