https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106702 Rule 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 cannot be invoked where a specific statutory remedy exists under Section 446(2)(d) of the Companies Act, 1956 for deciding questions of law or fact arising in winding up, including disputes over the company's land and the validity of its sale. The inherent powers of the Company Court are therefore excluded in such matters. The commentary also notes that equitable relief may be refused where the claimant approaches after inordinate delay, offers no satisfactory explanation for laches, and fails to establish title or interest in the disputed land, especially when revenue records stand against the claim. en-us Wed, 03 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:59:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106702 Rule 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 cannot be invoked where a specific statutory remedy exists under Section 446(2)(d) of the Companies Act, 1956 for deciding questions of law or fact arising in winding up, including disputes over the company's land and the validity of its sale. The inherent powers of the Company Court are therefore excluded in such matters. The commentary also notes that equitable relief may be refused where the claimant approaches after inordinate delay, offers no satisfactory explanation for laches, and fails to establish title or interest in the disputed land, especially when revenue records stand against the claim. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 03 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106702