<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (3) TMI 831 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106694</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the application to set aside the sale confirmation in favor of the respondent, upholding the validity of the sale. The court found no merit in the allegations of sale area discrepancy, affirmed the respondent&#039;s locus standi challenge, and upheld the &quot;as is where is&quot; sale condition. The sale price was deemed adequate, exceeding valuation reports, and the court directed the return of the deposit amount. All interim orders were vacated, and the official liquidator was instructed to proceed with conveyance preparation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:45:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143714" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (3) TMI 831 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106694</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the application to set aside the sale confirmation in favor of the respondent, upholding the validity of the sale. The court found no merit in the allegations of sale area discrepancy, affirmed the respondent&#039;s locus standi challenge, and upheld the &quot;as is where is&quot; sale condition. The sale price was deemed adequate, exceeding valuation reports, and the court directed the return of the deposit amount. All interim orders were vacated, and the official liquidator was instructed to proceed with conveyance preparation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106694</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>