<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 668 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106691</link>
    <description>A trade discount on imported goods was held to be excludible from assessable value where the invoice did not describe it as a special discount and the supplier&#039;s unchallenged certificate showed that the same 25% to 30% discount was extended to all customers. On that material, the discount was treated as general in nature and not peculiar to the importer, so it was not includible in valuation and the refund claim was maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:47:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143711" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 668 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106691</link>
      <description>A trade discount on imported goods was held to be excludible from assessable value where the invoice did not describe it as a special discount and the supplier&#039;s unchallenged certificate showed that the same 25% to 30% discount was extended to all customers. On that material, the discount was treated as general in nature and not peculiar to the importer, so it was not includible in valuation and the refund claim was maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106691</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>