<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (3) TMI 829 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106688</link>
    <description>Beneficial owners of floating rate notes may enforce rights attached to those notes where the issuer recognises beneficial ownership. Notes acknowledging debt and promising repayment with interest may fall within the concept of debentures, making their holders deemed creditors for winding-up purposes. A trustee may be a necessary party because it can provide discharge, but its role does not necessarily remove noteholders&#039; statutory right to petition. Contractual enforcement conditions requiring trustee action must be assessed alongside the trustee&#039;s position and the noteholders&#039; interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:35:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143708" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (3) TMI 829 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106688</link>
      <description>Beneficial owners of floating rate notes may enforce rights attached to those notes where the issuer recognises beneficial ownership. Notes acknowledging debt and promising repayment with interest may fall within the concept of debentures, making their holders deemed creditors for winding-up purposes. A trustee may be a necessary party because it can provide discharge, but its role does not necessarily remove noteholders&#039; statutory right to petition. Contractual enforcement conditions requiring trustee action must be assessed alongside the trustee&#039;s position and the noteholders&#039; interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>