<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 658 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106679</link>
    <description>Electric control panels supplied with roof mounted package units were held not to form an integral part of a single air-conditioning system where the system came into existence only after site assembly of separate components; the components were therefore to be assessed separately and the department&#039;s valuation approach failed. The extended period of limitation was also unavailable because the assessee&#039;s separate classification and duty payment were already disclosed in returns, documents and audit records, so there was no suppression of facts. The impugned order was set aside and the assessee&#039;s appeal succeeded in full.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:15:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143699" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 658 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106679</link>
      <description>Electric control panels supplied with roof mounted package units were held not to form an integral part of a single air-conditioning system where the system came into existence only after site assembly of separate components; the components were therefore to be assessed separately and the department&#039;s valuation approach failed. The extended period of limitation was also unavailable because the assessee&#039;s separate classification and duty payment were already disclosed in returns, documents and audit records, so there was no suppression of facts. The impugned order was set aside and the assessee&#039;s appeal succeeded in full.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106679</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>