<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (3) TMI 819 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106678</link>
    <description>A creditor&#039;s winding up petition cannot be used to enforce a debt that is bona fide disputed, because mere non-payment does not by itself trigger the statutory presumption of inability to pay. Where the record shows a genuine dispute over mutual adjustments and liability for rent under the parties&#039; arrangements, the claim requires adjudication outside winding up proceedings. The company&#039;s financial statements also showed profitability and substantial assets, negativing any inference of commercial insolvency. The petition was therefore not maintainable as a debt-enforcement device, and no ground for winding up was made out.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:12:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143698" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (3) TMI 819 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106678</link>
      <description>A creditor&#039;s winding up petition cannot be used to enforce a debt that is bona fide disputed, because mere non-payment does not by itself trigger the statutory presumption of inability to pay. Where the record shows a genuine dispute over mutual adjustments and liability for rent under the parties&#039; arrangements, the claim requires adjudication outside winding up proceedings. The company&#039;s financial statements also showed profitability and substantial assets, negativing any inference of commercial insolvency. The petition was therefore not maintainable as a debt-enforcement device, and no ground for winding up was made out.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106678</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>