https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106672 Interim orders of the Debts Recovery Tribunal were held vulnerable where they were passed without hearing the defendants and without considering their objections. The High Court noted that granting interim relief, directing deposit, and contemplating appointment of a receiver without an effective opportunity of hearing was contrary to section 19(20) of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993. The orders were also described as laconic, unreasonable, and affected by total non-application of mind. The impugned orders were set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration after notice to both sides and in accordance with law. en-us Wed, 27 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:03:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106672 Interim orders of the Debts Recovery Tribunal were held vulnerable where they were passed without hearing the defendants and without considering their objections. The High Court noted that granting interim relief, directing deposit, and contemplating appointment of a receiver without an effective opportunity of hearing was contrary to section 19(20) of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993. The orders were also described as laconic, unreasonable, and affected by total non-application of mind. The impugned orders were set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration after notice to both sides and in accordance with law. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 27 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106672