<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 1241 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106662</link>
    <description>Pending adjudication of title in the main appeal and suit, the Court considered a limited interim share-transfer arrangement to balance the competing interests of the applicants, the company, and financial institutions. It noted a prima facie basis for departing from the earlier status quo for interim purposes, including that the transfer had already been permitted through the public offer process and the applicants had paid above market value. The arrangement was confined to 50% of the shares, with restrictions on alienation and encumbrance, provisional receipt of dividends, and the deposited consideration kept in interest-bearing deposit, all without affecting final determination of rights.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:43:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 1241 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106662</link>
      <description>Pending adjudication of title in the main appeal and suit, the Court considered a limited interim share-transfer arrangement to balance the competing interests of the applicants, the company, and financial institutions. It noted a prima facie basis for departing from the earlier status quo for interim purposes, including that the transfer had already been permitted through the public offer process and the applicants had paid above market value. The arrangement was confined to 50% of the shares, with restrictions on alienation and encumbrance, provisional receipt of dividends, and the deposited consideration kept in interest-bearing deposit, all without affecting final determination of rights.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>