<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (7) TMI 658 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106652</link>
    <description>The appeal was disposed of with the decision to recalculate duty demand based on the fair selling price of compressors, excluding additional accessory prices, as determined by the Cost Accountant. The Commissioner&#039;s order was modified, and the matter was remanded for recalculation of duty demand. The appellants were instructed to pay any balance duty owed after adjustment for duty already paid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:27:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143672" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (7) TMI 658 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106652</link>
      <description>The appeal was disposed of with the decision to recalculate duty demand based on the fair selling price of compressors, excluding additional accessory prices, as determined by the Cost Accountant. The Commissioner&#039;s order was modified, and the matter was remanded for recalculation of duty demand. The appellants were instructed to pay any balance duty owed after adjustment for duty already paid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>