https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106649 Where the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 provides an appeal under Section 20 against orders of the Debts Recovery Tribunal, supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 should ordinarily not be invoked. The statutory scheme creates a complete appellate hierarchy, including procedural rules on limitation and fees, and operates as an effective alternative remedy for recovery disputes. In these circumstances, the High Court should refrain from entertaining a petition under Article 227 unless exceptional grounds such as lack of jurisdiction are shown. The revision petitions were therefore held not maintainable in view of the available statutory appeal. en-us Fri, 15 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:19:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106649 Where the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 provides an appeal under Section 20 against orders of the Debts Recovery Tribunal, supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 should ordinarily not be invoked. The statutory scheme creates a complete appellate hierarchy, including procedural rules on limitation and fees, and operates as an effective alternative remedy for recovery disputes. In these circumstances, the High Court should refrain from entertaining a petition under Article 227 unless exceptional grounds such as lack of jurisdiction are shown. The revision petitions were therefore held not maintainable in view of the available statutory appeal. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 15 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106649