<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 1224 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106645</link>
    <description>The court granted sanction to the scheme of demerger and transfer of the bulk drugs manufacturing unit from Darshak Ltd. to Alembic Ltd. The court approved the exchange ratio of six equity shares of Rs. 10 each in Alembic Ltd. for every 100 shares in Darshak Ltd., based on a valuation report. Objections regarding non-disclosure of directors&#039; interests and the latest financial positions were dismissed. The court found the objections raised by a shareholder to be without merit, and the scheme was overwhelmingly approved by creditors and shareholders. The court allowed the petition and directed the petitioner to pay specified fees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:10:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143665" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 1224 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106645</link>
      <description>The court granted sanction to the scheme of demerger and transfer of the bulk drugs manufacturing unit from Darshak Ltd. to Alembic Ltd. The court approved the exchange ratio of six equity shares of Rs. 10 each in Alembic Ltd. for every 100 shares in Darshak Ltd., based on a valuation report. Objections regarding non-disclosure of directors&#039; interests and the latest financial positions were dismissed. The court found the objections raised by a shareholder to be without merit, and the scheme was overwhelmingly approved by creditors and shareholders. The court allowed the petition and directed the petitioner to pay specified fees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106645</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>