<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 1221 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106641</link>
    <description>Pending proceedings before the Debts Recovery Tribunal do not, by themselves, bar the Official Liquidator from selling a company&#039;s assets in liquidation under the Companies Act, 1956, because the Tribunal&#039;s role remains confined to adjudication and recovery of bank debts and does not displace the winding-up process. The banks&#039; rights are protected through statutory priorities in distribution of sale proceeds. A private sale proposal for the company as a going concern cannot replace a court-supervised sale process without proper judicial sanction; wider publicity, sealed tenders, and participation of the Official Liquidator and stakeholders remain necessary to secure a fair realisation of assets.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:05:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143661" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 1221 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106641</link>
      <description>Pending proceedings before the Debts Recovery Tribunal do not, by themselves, bar the Official Liquidator from selling a company&#039;s assets in liquidation under the Companies Act, 1956, because the Tribunal&#039;s role remains confined to adjudication and recovery of bank debts and does not displace the winding-up process. The banks&#039; rights are protected through statutory priorities in distribution of sale proceeds. A private sale proposal for the company as a going concern cannot replace a court-supervised sale process without proper judicial sanction; wider publicity, sealed tenders, and participation of the Official Liquidator and stakeholders remain necessary to secure a fair realisation of assets.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106641</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>