https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106637 A chit transaction dispute was treated as governed by the Chit Funds Act, 1982, a special statute providing its own dispute-resolution machinery, so a consumer forum under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 was not the proper forum. The petitioner was also held barred from later disputing jurisdiction at the execution stage because he had allowed the ex parte order to attain finality, pursued the matter no further, and acquiesced in the proceedings. The discretionary writ remedy was declined on account of that conduct and delay, leaving the execution order operative. en-us Thu, 14 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Mar 2012 10:56:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106637 A chit transaction dispute was treated as governed by the Chit Funds Act, 1982, a special statute providing its own dispute-resolution machinery, so a consumer forum under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 was not the proper forum. The petitioner was also held barred from later disputing jurisdiction at the execution stage because he had allowed the ex parte order to attain finality, pursued the matter no further, and acquiesced in the proceedings. The discretionary writ remedy was declined on account of that conduct and delay, leaving the execution order operative. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 14 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106637