<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 1216 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106635</link>
    <description>The court dismissed both Notices of Motion, ruling that neither party could withdraw the deposited amount without a decree. The amount was to remain in a fixed deposit, accruing interest, until the dispute was resolved through proper legal procedures and evidence recording. This decision ensures compliance with procedural laws and protects the interests of both parties pending a final judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 10:52:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143655" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 1216 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106635</link>
      <description>The court dismissed both Notices of Motion, ruling that neither party could withdraw the deposited amount without a decree. The amount was to remain in a fixed deposit, accruing interest, until the dispute was resolved through proper legal procedures and evidence recording. This decision ensures compliance with procedural laws and protects the interests of both parties pending a final judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>