<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (6) TMI 511 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106625</link>
    <description>A port trust that takes custody of warehoused imported goods continues to owe the duty of a statutory bailee, so liability for loss by fire remains unless due care is proved. Customs supervision of a bonded warehouse does not displace the port trust&#039;s separate statutory responsibility for custody and preservation, because the customs and port regimes operate in distinct spheres. A fire can be treated as an act of God only on proof of a natural and irresistible cause; absent evidence of such an event and absent proof of proper bailee care, that defence fails.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 10:34:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (6) TMI 511 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106625</link>
      <description>A port trust that takes custody of warehoused imported goods continues to owe the duty of a statutory bailee, so liability for loss by fire remains unless due care is proved. Customs supervision of a bonded warehouse does not displace the port trust&#039;s separate statutory responsibility for custody and preservation, because the customs and port regimes operate in distinct spheres. A fire can be treated as an act of God only on proof of a natural and irresistible cause; absent evidence of such an event and absent proof of proper bailee care, that defence fails.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106625</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>