<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (6) TMI 510 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106624</link>
    <description>A formulation based on a bulk drug specified in the First Schedule to the Drugs (Prices Control) Order, 1987 was treated as eligible for exemption because the notification did not require proof of use in a National Health Programme. Denial of exemption solely on the ground that the product was not shown to be sold or used for that programme was therefore not justified. Clarifications under an earlier notification supported that reading, and trade notices concerning a different notification and drug category were not applicable. The exemption claim was accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:56:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (6) TMI 510 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106624</link>
      <description>A formulation based on a bulk drug specified in the First Schedule to the Drugs (Prices Control) Order, 1987 was treated as eligible for exemption because the notification did not require proof of use in a National Health Programme. Denial of exemption solely on the ground that the product was not shown to be sold or used for that programme was therefore not justified. Clarifications under an earlier notification supported that reading, and trade notices concerning a different notification and drug category were not applicable. The exemption claim was accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>