<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 1227 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106623</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition as the petitioner failed to meet the eligibility criteria and significantly delayed expressing interest in the disinvestment process of VSNL. The court upheld the process as competitive and in the public interest, emphasizing that the respondents&#039; actions were lawful and not arbitrary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:57:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143643" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 1227 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106623</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition as the petitioner failed to meet the eligibility criteria and significantly delayed expressing interest in the disinvestment process of VSNL. The court upheld the process as competitive and in the public interest, emphasizing that the respondents&#039; actions were lawful and not arbitrary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106623</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>